Church of the poor: Turning the world upside-down

iss520hodge20hill20portraitInspired by Pope Francis’ vision of “a poor church, for the poor”, Church Action on Poverty is exploring how churches can do more to stand in solidarity with people in poverty. We’ve invited many prominent Christians to share their thoughts on this. Their reflections will appear here, and in a new publication to be released soon. Today: Al Barrett, an Anglican priest living on an urban ‘outer estate’ in the West Midlands.

A church for the poor? Now that would be a good start! For those for whom life is constantly precarious, a daily struggle to make ends meet? For those whose tightly-limited spending power means their voices seem to count for little, whose defences against life’s shocks have often worn thin? For those who live on ill-served council estates and densely-populated inner-city streets? For these first and foremost – and not primarily, unquestioningly, for those who can afford to pay the piper and call the tune, for those who are cushioned by the defences bought with a bit of money in the bank, for those who can navigate comfortably the coffee shops and corridors and social connections where power moves and decisions are made? Because a church whose default position is for these, will be a church that works against the poor, whatever its ‘good intentions’.

So a church for the poor? Yes, that would be a good start.

But a church for the poor. Not just a food bank for the poor, a debt advice project for the poor, a campaigning organisation for the poor, an ESOL class, a financial literacy session, a cooking group, a gardening club for the poor… A church for the poor, where the holy of holies is rent open, where middle-class norms don’t prevail and exclude, where middle-class anxieties aren’t the driving force and the criteria for making decisions. A church where all are welcomed and embraced.

A church for the poor would be challenging, disturbing, in a society that prefers to keep the poor at arm’s length, if not out of sight and out of mind.

But that little word ‘for’ is troubling. Because who is to set up this ‘church for the poor’? Who is to plant it, and grow it, and water it? Who are the ‘we’ who are ‘for’ these ‘others’?
So how about we redefine our economic imagination? Instead of imagining that ‘contributions’ must primarily be financial, why not discover the wealth of riches in stories, and experience, and bodies, and the vulnerabilities that open us to each other as members together of the body of Christ? Instead of starting with the roles that need filling, why not start with the gifts – sometimes the awkward, troubling, difficult gifts – that people bring, even the gifts they are barely aware of, or can barely imagine might be gifts? Instead of spotting gaps in the ‘service provision market’ as ‘golden opportunities’ for the church to find its place, what about a church that discovers its resources, its centres, its leadership and its voice in the non-places that have been pushed off society’s maps?

What if there’s a power, greater than the power of money or might or media influence, bubbling up from those places, among those people, between those bodies, within those stories?

The power of God – how foolish! – that will turn the world upside-down.


You can read Al’s reflections on faith and community at his blog This Estate We’re In or follow him at @hodgehillvicar

One thought on “Church of the poor: Turning the world upside-down

  1. I too find posing a question about a ‘church for the poor’ a troubling place to start, since it suggests that the church currently belongs to the ‘rich’. It is true that in some denominations and parts of the world, church institutions, culture and leadership are dominated by middle class people, but we needn’t fear that they/we truly hold power in the church, which is a body belonging to Jesus. The parts that don’t recognise this, and don’t ‘organically’ – and by dint of becoming like Jesus – incorporate diverse groups of people tend to become the most lifeless. I’m not saying there isn’t a (big) challenge/problem to respond to in this respect, but the balance of ‘power’, numbers, influence, ‘life’ etc. within the global (and UK) church is shifting and will probably continue to do so regardless of the fact that those who thought they held power didn’t realise in time that they were meant to be giving it away. Though I don’t really like the term ‘poor’, I’m reminded of a quote about the Azusa Street revival which I find very inspiring: ‘We wanted to hear from God, through whoever he might speak … The rich and educated were the same as the poor and ignorant, and [the former] found a much harder death to die. We only recognized God. All were equal. No flesh might glory in His presence. He could not use the self-opinionated… All came down in humility together, at His feet… The fodder was thus placed for the lambs, not for giraffes. All could reach it.’ (Bartleman, 1925).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s